• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Joint Public Issues Team

Churches working for peace and justice

  • Home Page
  • Who We Are
    • Six hopes for society
  • Issues
    • Economy
      • Tax Justice
      • Reset The Debt
      • Living Wage
    • Environment
      • Net Zero In My Neighbourhood
    • Poverty and Inequality
      • The Cost of Living Crisis
      • Universal Credit
      • Truth and Lies
      • Enough
      • Rethink Sanctions
      • Faith in Foodbanks
      • Housing and Homelessness
    • Asylum and Migration
      • Refugees
      • End Hostility
      • The Asylum System
    • Peacemaking
      • The Arms Trade
      • Nuclear Weapons
      • Drones
      • Peacemaking resources
    • Politics and Elections
      • Elections
      • Meet Your MP
      • Art of the Possible
      • Brexit
    • Other Issues
      • International Development
      • Modern Slavery and Exploitation
        • Forced labour in fashion
  • Get Involved
    • JPIT Conference 2022
    • Newsletter
    • Events
    • Walking with Micah
  • Resources
    • Advent
    • 10 Minutes on… podcast
    • Politics in the Pulpit?
    • Stay and Pray
    • Season of Creation
    • Prayers
    • Public Issues Calendar
    • Poetry
    • Small Group Resources
  • Blog

Worklessness or Unemployment?

Blog, Poverty and Inequality · 26 March, 2012

by Tim Stacey

How we describe something changes how we think of something. It is different to say that someone “cannot find a job” or is unemployed than it is to say that person is workless. Saying that a person is workless puts their lack of work as a characteristic of their personrather than as a characteristic of society. It says this person does not work rather than this person cannot find employment.

The government’s own definition of worklessness is wider than its definition of unemployment. The term “workless people” includes unemployed people but also people too disabled to work, carers, students and (by some definitions) pensioners.

I would think that it is quite insulting to carers to say that they don’t work simply because they are not in employment. Labelling all those not in paid employment as workless effectively devalues all the work that they do. This work is vital to our society and includes caring for children, the old and the sick. If people did not do such caring it would cost the state vast sums of money to provide it.

In the government’s new Social Justice Strategy Paper the government highlights worklessness as a problem affecting society. It says that worklessness can be a problem in families and highlights the number of families which are workless. One section of the report is devoted to the importance of work but not only does it fail to mention the importance of work outside of employment, it also fails to mention the current difficulties of finding employment.

The report mentions that the number of households where no one has ever worked has been increasing since before the financial crisis. However, it fails to mention that the 297,000 households this concerns are dwarfed by the overall number unemployed and the increase in unemployment since the recession.

Not being in employment (remember worklessness includes disabled people and students as well as the unemployed) is the problem that the government singles out as needing tackling rather than unemployment itself, despite the largest group by far being the unemployed.

The problem as defined by the government that there is “a culture of worklessness” in this country. A “culture of worklessness” is an odd phrase given how wide the definition of worklessness is.“A culture of being too disabled to work” is clearly ridiculous. And clearly as a society we need a culture of those prepared to study or care for those that need it.

What the government actually means when it says “a culture of worklessness” is a culture of unemployment and of people being on disability benefits but not being too disabled to work.

As addressed above unemployment is easily explained by a lack of jobs caused by recession. The question of disability benefits is slightly more complicated. Over 70% of those on incapacity benefit have been assessed as either unable to enter work or would struggle with regular work. These people often do in fact want to find work but cannot find work that is adapted to their disability and also have to compete against the massive numbers of other unemployed people as mentioned above.

The lack of jobs makes for a more compelling explanation for the why these people cannot find work rather than ascribing a particular culture.

Meanwhile this focus by the government and the media on disabled people being able to work has coincided with rise in hate crimes towards disabled people. Disability hate crime increased by 75% from 2008 to 2009 as the Labour Government introduced its reforms to disability benefits and has increased further since.Many disabled people have described being frequently stopped on the street and asked if they have a real disability or if they are merely faking. Every time anyone uses the phrase worklessness instead of unemployment it is worth thinking if this usage is adding to this climate of hate or demonising people whose caring responsibilities support our society.

Filed Under: Blog, Poverty and Inequality

Next Post: Sermon notes: What – are we blind too? »

Primary Sidebar

Search

Recent Posts

  • JPIT’s Review of 2022
  • What does Government Support for Asylum Seekers really provide?
  • God with Us – the Refugees of Calais and Dunkirk
  • How can we respond to COP27?
  • Statement on the conclusion of the COP27 Climate Conference in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt
  • COP27 – what should we be looking for?
  • “He has filled the hungry with good things” – What we need from the Autumn Budget
  • What are the stories we should tell about the humanitarian crisis at Manston Airport Asylum centre?
  • How can we be sure that the products we buy are not the result of modern slavery?
  • Why I hate Warm Banks (and why my church is opening one)
  • How does our theology call us to challenge Poverty?
  • Introducing Alfie
  • Biden says nuclear risk is the highest since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis
  • Churches respond to risk to benefit levels
  • Briefing on the ‘Mini Budget’ for the Enough to Live group
  • Introducing Hazel
  • Introducing Hannah
  • An energy cap announcement in three parts: the good, the absent and the ugly
  • Afghanistan and the UK – One Year On from the Fall Of Kabul
  • Inflation, interest rates and the poorest

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter

Footer

Follow us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Quick links

Stay and Pray
Politics in the Pulpit
Faith in Politics podcast
Public Issues Calendar
Useful Links

Our work

About Us
Meet the Team
Join the Team 
Internship
Our Newsletter

Contact us

25 Marylebone Road
London NW1 5JR

Tel: 020 7916 8632

enquiries@jpit.uk

Copyright © 2023 · Showcase Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in