• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Joint Public Issues Team

Churches working for peace and justice

  • Home Page
  • Who We Are
    • Six hopes for society
  • Issues
    • Economy
      • Tax Justice
      • Reset The Debt
      • Living Wage
    • Environment
      • Net Zero In My Neighbourhood
    • Poverty and Inequality
      • The Cost of Living Crisis
      • Universal Credit
      • Truth and Lies
      • Enough
      • Rethink Sanctions
      • Faith in Foodbanks
      • Housing and Homelessness
    • Asylum and Migration
      • Refugees
      • End Hostility
      • The Asylum System
    • Peacemaking
      • The Arms Trade
      • Nuclear Weapons
      • Drones
      • Peacemaking resources
    • Politics and Elections
      • Elections
      • Meet Your MP
      • Art of the Possible
      • Brexit
    • Other Issues
      • International Development
      • Modern Slavery and Exploitation
        • Forced labour in fashion
  • Get Involved
    • JPIT Conference 2022
    • Newsletter
    • Events
    • Walking with Micah
  • Resources
    • Advent
    • 10 Minutes on… podcast
    • Politics in the Pulpit?
    • Stay and Pray
    • Season of Creation
    • Prayers
    • Public Issues Calendar
    • Poetry
    • Small Group Resources
  • Blog

Blog, Poverty and Inequality · 8 July, 2015

You don’t get to call it a Living Wage unless you can live on it

Today’s budget ended with the Chancellor announcing a “National Living Wage”. The name was right, the marketing was cunning but sadly the policy bears no resemblance to a Living Wage.  The Living Wage is an ethical principle converted into a wage rate; today’s “National Living Wage” is a welcome rise in the Minimum Wage, wedded to a damaging marketing gimmick.

What is a Living Wage?

Simply put a Living Wage is enough for a person to exchange their full time work for a decent standard of living. Converting this principle, first laid out in the 1891 papal encyclical Rerum Novarum, into a workable hourly wage rate is a serious and difficult task.

The Joseph Rowntree Foundation, the London Mayor’s office, Loughborough University and others undertake a large research project asking people throughout society what is needed for a decent minimal standard of living. The goods and services required are priced up and the hourly wage needed by a full-time worker to afford them is calculated. It involves estimates and compromises as families are all different with different needs. But it is an honest attempt at real social justice.

The legal National Minimum Wage was never set with reference to how much a person needed to live. It was set at a sufficiently low level such that it was believed it would not reduce the number of jobs in the economy. Today’s announcement was a very welcome an increase in the Minimum Wage, taking back to pre-recession levels. It was not however set with reference to how much is needed to live – and the new remit for the Low Pay Commission confirms there is no intention to do such a calculation. In short it is not a Living Wage.

Stealing the name – forgetting the principle

The remit given to the Low Pay Commission today shows what appears to be a naked attempt to steal the name “Living Wage” and subvert it. The name Living Wage is worth stealing mainly due to the brilliant work of churches, charities and especially the Living Wage Foundation in modernizing and explaining the simple morality of the Living Wage principle.

Previously the Low Pay Commission set rates for different age groups, with the adult rate being higher and applying to over 25 year-olds. After today the Commission will do exactly the same thing but the difference between the rate for under 25 year-olds and over 25 year-olds will be renamed “the Living Wage Premium”. This “premium” will not be set with any reference to what people need to live nor to the Living Wage principle.

This strange arrangement makes no practical difference, but does grab the name “Living Wage” as well ensuring the name “Minimum Wage” is remains. An improved but still inadequate Minimum Wage has been rebranded a “Living Wage” and the task of explaining and campaigning for a real Living Wage has been made more difficult. .

The Living Wage it is a principle that should be treated with respect because paying people enough to live on is important. It is a principle that is almost universally accepted – today’s rise in the Minimum Wage alongside the attempt to commandeer the Living Wage name is evidence of this. It is however damaging and unacceptable to call a wage that people cannot live on a “Living Wage”.

Filed Under: Blog, Poverty and Inequality Tagged With: department of work and pension, living wage, work

Paul Morrison

I am the policy advisor with particular responsibility for issues around the economy including poverty and inequality. Prior to working for the Methodist Church I was a postdoctoral researcher at Imperial College studying viral disease and vaccine design.

Previous Post: « #rethinksanctions:Responding to your MP
Next Post: A statement on the situation in Calais »

Primary Sidebar

Search

Recent Posts

  • JPIT’s Review of 2022
  • What does Government Support for Asylum Seekers really provide?
  • God with Us – the Refugees of Calais and Dunkirk
  • How can we respond to COP27?
  • Statement on the conclusion of the COP27 Climate Conference in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt
  • COP27 – what should we be looking for?
  • “He has filled the hungry with good things” – What we need from the Autumn Budget
  • What are the stories we should tell about the humanitarian crisis at Manston Airport Asylum centre?
  • How can we be sure that the products we buy are not the result of modern slavery?
  • Why I hate Warm Banks (and why my church is opening one)
  • How does our theology call us to challenge Poverty?
  • Introducing Alfie
  • Biden says nuclear risk is the highest since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis
  • Churches respond to risk to benefit levels
  • Briefing on the ‘Mini Budget’ for the Enough to Live group
  • Introducing Hazel
  • Introducing Hannah
  • An energy cap announcement in three parts: the good, the absent and the ugly
  • Afghanistan and the UK – One Year On from the Fall Of Kabul
  • Inflation, interest rates and the poorest

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter

Footer

Follow us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Quick links

Stay and Pray
Politics in the Pulpit
Faith in Politics podcast
Public Issues Calendar
Useful Links

Our work

About Us
Meet the Team
Join the Team 
Internship
Our Newsletter

Contact us

25 Marylebone Road
London NW1 5JR

Tel: 020 7916 8632

enquiries@jpit.uk

Copyright © 2023 · Showcase Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in