• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Joint Public Issues Team

Churches working for peace and justice

  • Home Page
  • Who We Are
    • Six hopes for society
  • Issues
    • Economy
      • Tax Justice
      • Reset The Debt
      • Living Wage
    • Environment
      • Net Zero In My Neighbourhood
    • Poverty and Inequality
      • The Cost of Living Crisis
      • Universal Credit
      • Truth and Lies
      • Enough
      • Rethink Sanctions
      • Faith in Foodbanks
      • Housing and Homelessness
    • Asylum and Migration
      • Refugees
      • End Hostility
      • The Asylum System
    • Peacemaking
      • The Arms Trade
      • Nuclear Weapons
      • Drones
      • Peacemaking resources
    • Politics and Elections
      • Elections
      • Meet Your MP
      • Art of the Possible
      • Brexit
    • Other Issues
      • International Development
      • Modern Slavery and Exploitation
        • Forced labour in fashion
  • Get Involved
    • JPIT Conference 2022
    • Newsletter
    • Events
    • Walking with Micah
  • Resources
    • Advent
    • 10 Minutes on… podcast
    • Politics in the Pulpit?
    • Stay and Pray
    • Season of Creation
    • Prayers
    • Public Issues Calendar
    • Poetry
    • Small Group Resources
  • Blog

Perpetuating a dangerous myth

Blog, Poverty and Inequality · 19 January, 2018

Challenging the myths around ‘workless families’.

For many years the myth of ‘workless families’ and a ‘culture of worklessness’ has been perpetuated by politicians who should know better. Recent debates over Universal Credit, and the scandal of Ben Bradley’s blog are just two examples of this. It continues to be essential to challenge this lie.

The comments of Ben Bradley MP, newly appointed Tory Vice-Chairman for Youth, that those who are unemployed should have vasectomies are deeply offensive and have rightly been condemned across the board.

Within the blog Bradley referred to ‘Families who have never worked a day in their lives’. The image this conjures up, of a family in which there are generations who have always been ‘workless’, has no basis in evidence. Families with two generations of ‘worklessness’ are extraordinarily rare. Families with three generations of ‘worklessness’ do not exist.

The Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) undertook extensive research around the example raised by politicians of families in which there are three generations of permanently unemployed people. JRF were unable to locate any such families. And as for families with two generations of ‘worklessness’ these were found to make up ‘under 1 per cent of workless households.’

Most importantly JRF research showed that there was no evidence of a culture of ‘worklessness’ within families suffering from unemployment. Quite the contrary, the value of working for a living (socially, psychologically, and financially) was stressed across the generations. Unemployment was not seen as an easy existence.

Nevertheless, politicians continue to perpetuate the myth of ‘workless’ families and ‘workless’ cultures. In a debate on Universal Credit on the 23 November 2017, Baroness Buscombe argued that the positive impact sanctions had on behaviour could be seen through ‘the context of people whose families have for generations not had work in their lives’.  In her response to questions concerning the evidence base of such a claim Baroness Buscombe highlighted evidence that ‘a strong association [is found] between being in a workless household aged 14/15, and poorer education outcomes, and worklessness and poverty in adulthood.’

There are two things worth noting about this response. First, her response does not pertain to ‘generations’ of workless families, as referenced in her original statement. Second, what she is highlighting demonstrates only a correlation and not causation which, as any scientist will tell you, are not the same thing.

Evidence clearly shows that the primary factor in determining outcomes for children, including poorer education outcomes and worklessness, is parental income not employment status.

Indeed, where higher income groups are studied and a comparison is made between families where at least one parent is working, and single parent families where no parent is working, it is found that this has little effect on educational and work outcomes for the child. The primary determining factor is income, not work.

We must continue to challenge the myth of the ‘workless’ family. There is no evidence for the existence of families with generations of ‘worklessness’ nor is there any evidence that ‘worklessness’ perpetuates itself. Continuing to make these false claims only stigmatises people in poverty further. Worse the perpetuation of such a myth leads to policies built on false assumptions. Far too often these policies are inadequate as a result. If you catch a politician making claims about ‘workless’ families challenge them to produce evidence, whether that be by writing to them, or speaking to them in person. Such a challenge is fundamental to changing the narrative around poverty.

 

Filed Under: Blog, Poverty and Inequality Tagged With: department of work and pension, poverty

Madalena Leao

Previous Post: « Gambling – a chance to have your say
Next Post: Universal Credit: Increasing poverty by design »

Primary Sidebar

Search

Recent Posts

  • JPIT’s Review of 2022
  • What does Government Support for Asylum Seekers really provide?
  • God with Us – the Refugees of Calais and Dunkirk
  • How can we respond to COP27?
  • Statement on the conclusion of the COP27 Climate Conference in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt
  • COP27 – what should we be looking for?
  • “He has filled the hungry with good things” – What we need from the Autumn Budget
  • What are the stories we should tell about the humanitarian crisis at Manston Airport Asylum centre?
  • How can we be sure that the products we buy are not the result of modern slavery?
  • Why I hate Warm Banks (and why my church is opening one)
  • How does our theology call us to challenge Poverty?
  • Introducing Alfie
  • Biden says nuclear risk is the highest since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis
  • Churches respond to risk to benefit levels
  • Briefing on the ‘Mini Budget’ for the Enough to Live group
  • Introducing Hazel
  • Introducing Hannah
  • An energy cap announcement in three parts: the good, the absent and the ugly
  • Afghanistan and the UK – One Year On from the Fall Of Kabul
  • Inflation, interest rates and the poorest

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter

Footer

Follow us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Quick links

Stay and Pray
Politics in the Pulpit
Faith in Politics podcast
Public Issues Calendar
Useful Links

Our work

About Us
Meet the Team
Join the Team 
Internship
Our Newsletter

Contact us

25 Marylebone Road
London NW1 5JR

Tel: 020 7916 8632

enquiries@jpit.uk

Copyright © 2023 · Showcase Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in