• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Joint Public Issues Team

Churches working for peace and justice

  • Home Page
  • Who We Are
    • Six hopes for society
  • Issues
    • Economy
      • Tax Justice
      • Reset The Debt
      • Living Wage
    • Environment
      • Net Zero In My Neighbourhood
    • Poverty and Inequality
      • The Cost of Living Crisis
      • Universal Credit
      • Truth and Lies
      • Enough
      • Rethink Sanctions
      • Faith in Foodbanks
      • Housing and Homelessness
    • Asylum and Migration
      • Refugees
      • End Hostility
      • The Asylum System
    • Peacemaking
      • The Arms Trade
      • Nuclear Weapons
      • Drones
      • Peacemaking resources
    • Politics and Elections
      • Elections
      • Meet Your MP
      • Art of the Possible
      • Brexit
    • Other Issues
      • International Development
      • Modern Slavery and Exploitation
        • Forced labour in fashion
  • Get Involved
    • JPIT Conference 2022
    • Newsletter
    • Events
    • Walking with Micah
  • Resources
    • Advent
    • 10 Minutes on… podcast
    • Politics in the Pulpit?
    • Stay and Pray
    • Season of Creation
    • Prayers
    • Public Issues Calendar
    • Poetry
    • Small Group Resources
  • Blog

MPs Windrush inquiry questions hostile environment policies

Asylum and Migration, Blog · 4 July, 2018

Earlier this week, the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee released the report on its inquiry into the Windrush scandal. It is highly critical of the government’s actions and confirmed many of the concerns raised in JPIT’s recent report Destitution, Discrimination & Distrust: The Web of the Hostile Environment.

The cross-party group of MPs concluded that some members of the ‘Windrush Generation’ had been “denied their rights” and “treated appallingly”. Their inquiry found that this was the result of deliberate government policies and practices, reporting that “the extension of hostile environment measures and enforcement has led to people with a lawful right to be in the UK being unable to access services to which they are entitled. As has become clear, the Windrush generation are one such example of people with a lawful right to be here, caught up in the compliant environment, and who have suffered avoidable hardship and distress as a result.”

This echoes JPIT’s description of the hostile environment as “a web of checks designed to catch people out,” and the widely publicised experiences of some members of the Windrush Generation illustrate the human cost of such policies. But we believe that no-one, whatever their immigration status, should intentionally be made to suffer such hardship and distress. As Christians, we affirm the dignity of every human being and so consider it unacceptable to ever use destitution, or the threat of destitution, as a tool of government policy.

A culture of suspicion

The Committee condemned the increasing culture of distrust within the Home Office, which created “an environment in which people wishing to document their status appear to have been automatically treated with suspicion and scepticism. They had been made to follow processes that appear designed to set them up to fail, while at the same time vital avenues for support such as legal aid and the right of appeal had been removed.”

As Christians, we believe that God calls us into relationships founded on mutuality and interdependence, not distrust and suspicion.

Ineffectiveness

While it lays bare the negative impact of the hostile environment policy on the Windrush Generation, the Committee report also questions its effectiveness. It points out that “one of the aims of the hostile environment is to encourage people illegally present in the UK to leave; yet [Home Office staff] told us that the number of voluntary returns had not increased following the introduction of more stringent measures.”

It heard that the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration had found no evidence that the Home Office was measuring the effectiveness of the hostile environment. Nor was it collecting any data on the mistakes it has made in the enforcement of the hostile environment, and “did not appear to appreciate the seriousness of such errors for the individuals affected.”

The Committee is scathing in its response to these shortcomings, saying “It is irresponsible for the Government to rely on a policy when it lacks information on whether that policy is leading to injustice or abuse or even achieving its aims.”

Looking forward

The report calls for an independent review to look at the lessons to be learned from the Windrush scandal, “to ensure no-one else living in the UK has to go through the same mistreatment, whether now or in the future.”

Looking at the wider implications of its inquiry, it concludes, “We question whether the hostile environment should in fact continue in anything like its current form. Simply rebranding it as the ‘compliant’ environment is a meaningless response to genuine concerns. We call for essential checks and balances in the system to be reinstated, and for the whole suite of hostile environment measures to be subject to an evaluation, in terms of their efficacy, fairness, impact (including both intended and unintended consequences) and value-for-money.”

As Churches, we agree. We believe that the hostile environment inflicts destitution, encourages discrimination, and spins a web of distrust. We are demanding a full independent inquiry into Home Office immigration policy and practice which examines the damaging effect that they are having on the whole of society, as a first step towards the ending of the hostile environment.

To add your voice to the campaign…

write to your MP today

Filed Under: Asylum and Migration, Blog

Simeon Mitchell

I became interim JPIT Team Leader in April 2021, and have the privilege and responsibility of coordinating the work of the team. I was previously Deputy Team Leader, and have been Secretary for Church and Society for the United Reformed Church since January 2018. My background is in international development and enabling Christians and churches to respond to issues of global poverty and injustice. I live in Oxford with my wife and three children, and am a preacher and lay leader in my local church.

Previous Post: « Ed’s story
Next Post: Updated Universal Credit Briefing »

Primary Sidebar

Search

Recent Posts

  • JPIT’s Review of 2022
  • What does Government Support for Asylum Seekers really provide?
  • God with Us – the Refugees of Calais and Dunkirk
  • How can we respond to COP27?
  • Statement on the conclusion of the COP27 Climate Conference in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt
  • COP27 – what should we be looking for?
  • “He has filled the hungry with good things” – What we need from the Autumn Budget
  • What are the stories we should tell about the humanitarian crisis at Manston Airport Asylum centre?
  • How can we be sure that the products we buy are not the result of modern slavery?
  • Why I hate Warm Banks (and why my church is opening one)
  • How does our theology call us to challenge Poverty?
  • Introducing Alfie
  • Biden says nuclear risk is the highest since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis
  • Churches respond to risk to benefit levels
  • Briefing on the ‘Mini Budget’ for the Enough to Live group
  • Introducing Hazel
  • Introducing Hannah
  • An energy cap announcement in three parts: the good, the absent and the ugly
  • Afghanistan and the UK – One Year On from the Fall Of Kabul
  • Inflation, interest rates and the poorest

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter

Footer

Follow us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Quick links

Stay and Pray
Politics in the Pulpit
Faith in Politics podcast
Public Issues Calendar
Useful Links

Our work

About Us
Meet the Team
Join the Team 
Internship
Our Newsletter

Contact us

25 Marylebone Road
London NW1 5JR

Tel: 020 7916 8632

enquiries@jpit.uk

Copyright © 2023 · Showcase Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in