• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Joint Public Issues Team

Churches working for peace and justice

  • Home Page
  • Who We Are
    • Six hopes for society
  • Issues
    • Economy
      • Tax Justice
      • Reset The Debt
      • Living Wage
    • Environment
      • Net Zero In My Neighbourhood
    • Poverty and Inequality
      • The Cost of Living Crisis
      • Universal Credit
      • Truth and Lies
      • Enough
      • Rethink Sanctions
      • Faith in Foodbanks
      • Housing and Homelessness
    • Asylum and Migration
      • Refugees
      • End Hostility
      • The Asylum System
    • Peacemaking
      • The Arms Trade
      • Nuclear Weapons
      • Drones
      • Peacemaking resources
    • Politics and Elections
      • Elections
      • Meet Your MP
      • Art of the Possible
      • Brexit
    • Other Issues
      • International Development
      • Modern Slavery and Exploitation
        • Forced labour in fashion
  • Get Involved
    • JPIT Conference 2022
    • Newsletter
    • Events
    • Walking with Micah
  • Resources
    • Advent
    • 10 Minutes on… podcast
    • Politics in the Pulpit?
    • Stay and Pray
    • Season of Creation
    • Prayers
    • Public Issues Calendar
    • Poetry
    • Small Group Resources
  • Blog

At last the Government is Rethinking Sanctions: Now let’s do it properly

Blog, Poverty and Inequality, Universal Credit · 9 May, 2019

This is a blog which contains joy and danger in equal measure.

The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions has decided to stop imposing three year-long benefit sanctions as a punishment for not obeying the instructions of the Jobcentre. Such sanctions meant that people had no support for food or heat for 3-years, causing untold hardship.  I am overjoyed that this will stop.

Our report calling for a full review of the benefit sanctions system

I am angry that such a foolish policy was ever started and that so many lives have been damaged in the last seven years. We will never know how many lives have been damaged – as the government does not keep count.

I have only met one person on a three-year sanction.

Tara’s[1] life story up to the point of having her income taken from her was one of abuse, by family and by partners, and of never finding a stable life. A three year sanction simply reinforced the trap holding her in poverty.

What most struck me was how utterly resigned she was. She expected people to be unpleasant to her – and they were. The Government agency tasked with helping her was no better. My impression was that she felt her life was broken and was unconcerned when someone else kicked at the pieces.

It is hard to hold the memory of my conversation with her alongside the Government’s description of sanctions as “supporting families into work” without exploding with laughter and anger simultaneously.

Three year sanctions were part of a package of policies beginning in 2010 that massively increased the number and severity of sanctions applied to the unemployed and to some sick and disabled people also.

This system reversed natural justice. When the Jobcentre believes that an instruction has not been obeyed a sanction is applied and it is up to the claimant to prove their innocence – or “show good reason” as it is termed. The result is that those least able to argue their case are most likely to be sanctioned. Our data highlighted those with mental health problems but the trend is clear for other groups – those with the most difficulties are those who are sanctioned most.

Churches and charities have tried to support families affected by sanctions. Foodbanks are called upon to feed people who have been sanctioned and importantly they show compassion and humanity where the sanctions system has not.

Working with other Churches we challenged the injustice of the sanctions regime in the #RethinkSanctions campaign. We joined the chorus of organisations who continue to call for a full independent review of sanctions – where the costs and the benefits of this policy can be seen by all and where a better system could be created.

The sanctions policy’s stated intention was to move people into work – but there has never been evidence that ramping up sanctions would achieve this. Over the past 9 years the Government has refused to look for evidence that it policy is achieving its aims, and worse has refused to look for evidence of the hardship caused by its policy choices. While others – including ourselves and the Governments own watchdog the National Audit Office – produced report after report detailing the damage the policy has caused the Government preferred to maintain its ignorance.

Today the Secretary of State has said she reviewed the DWP’s internal unpublished data, which tells her that “a six-month sanction already provides a significant incentive to comply with the labour market regime”.

Surely today is the time to not just do a limited private review which leads to an eye-catching change before a planned speech – but to review all the evidence from Government, academia and charities so we can understand the real effects of the sanctions regime? Is it not time to listen to the stories of people who have been sanctioned to see if the data indicating “compliance with the labour market regime” is really worth the pain inflicted?

Today’s announcement is a start – but if benefit claimants are to be treated with the dignity and respect they deserve – it cannot be the end.


[1] Name changed to protect privacy

Filed Under: Blog, Poverty and Inequality, Universal Credit Tagged With: benefits, sanctions, Universal Credit

Paul Morrison

I am the policy advisor with particular responsibility for issues around the economy including poverty and inequality. Prior to working for the Methodist Church I was a postdoctoral researcher at Imperial College studying viral disease and vaccine design.

Previous Post: « European Elections 2019
Next Post: Turning up when it’s difficult »

Primary Sidebar

Search

Recent Posts

  • JPIT’s Review of 2022
  • What does Government Support for Asylum Seekers really provide?
  • God with Us – the Refugees of Calais and Dunkirk
  • How can we respond to COP27?
  • Statement on the conclusion of the COP27 Climate Conference in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt
  • COP27 – what should we be looking for?
  • “He has filled the hungry with good things” – What we need from the Autumn Budget
  • What are the stories we should tell about the humanitarian crisis at Manston Airport Asylum centre?
  • How can we be sure that the products we buy are not the result of modern slavery?
  • Why I hate Warm Banks (and why my church is opening one)
  • How does our theology call us to challenge Poverty?
  • Introducing Alfie
  • Biden says nuclear risk is the highest since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis
  • Churches respond to risk to benefit levels
  • Briefing on the ‘Mini Budget’ for the Enough to Live group
  • Introducing Hazel
  • Introducing Hannah
  • An energy cap announcement in three parts: the good, the absent and the ugly
  • Afghanistan and the UK – One Year On from the Fall Of Kabul
  • Inflation, interest rates and the poorest

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter

Footer

Follow us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Quick links

Stay and Pray
Politics in the Pulpit
Faith in Politics podcast
Public Issues Calendar
Useful Links

Our work

About Us
Meet the Team
Join the Team 
Internship
Our Newsletter

Contact us

25 Marylebone Road
London NW1 5JR

Tel: 020 7916 8632

enquiries@jpit.uk

Copyright © 2023 · Showcase Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in